7 Thoughts on “Fact Checking “Nobody Died At Sandy Hook”, Chapter Seven, Part Two

  1. Michelle on August 2, 2016 at 6:26 pm said:

    I notice that you attribute the iPhone 4s to both Nancy and Adam. Earlier, it was Nancy’s cell phone but now you’re saying she has a Blackberry and that the iPhone 4s is probably Adams. Both cannot be true.

    • Shill Murray on August 2, 2016 at 6:37 pm said:

      Michelle, you’re absolutely correct. Thank you for pointing that out. I made an assumption and did not source the claim, so it is on me entirely. I’ve made the appropriate corrections.

      The fact that the iPhone 4S belonged to Nancy and was her primary phone can be verified by multiple documents in the final report. Document #00051552 in Book 3 says of the iPhone: “The report indicates that the phone number assigned to that phone is [redacted]. Based on our investigation, we were able to determine that this phone belongs to and is used exclusively by Nancy Lanza.”

      • Michelle on August 2, 2016 at 7:01 pm said:

        I have spent a LOT of time reading about this case from both sides and I think you’re doing an admirable job! Thank you for taking my comment on board.

        • Shill Murray on August 2, 2016 at 7:10 pm said:

          Thanks, Michelle. Again, great catch.

          I think the main thing that separates people such as myself from the other folks (well, besides the obvious) is that I’m not afraid of criticism or making corrections to the material. When I say I’m interested in the truth, I actually mean it.

          • Michelle on August 2, 2016 at 7:19 pm said:

            Fantastic! I’m of the same mindset. There’s so much bullshit around that nobody knows the truth anymore, the fact that you’re doing something about it is wonderful to me! If you ever need someone to help in any way, I would gladly spend some time helping you.

  2. NotToday333 on April 29, 2017 at 10:44 pm said:

    Sec. 5 Back up scene 1 photos 472 and 473 show framed photos of a boy and a girl. There is also a photo with 4 children in them (472). Does anyone know who these kids are? I am assuming they are cousins, but I would still like to know their identities.

    • Shill Murray on April 30, 2017 at 3:59 am said:

      I’m not sure. Nancy had a number of siblings, and her obituary mentions her nieces and nephews, so you are likely correct.

Post Navigation