“Nobody Died At Sandy Hook” Chapter Twelve By: Sterling Harwood
“Carver said one can control the situation better by using instead photographs of the dead to identify the victims, depending on the photographer. Snopes.com said that what Carver meant was that one can use a photograph of the face to identify the victim without showing wounds to the body of a child. This, however, hardly depends on the photographer; this depends instead on the shooter and where he shot the child. If the shooter shot the child in the face or even shot the identifying features of the child’s face off, then the photographer wouldn’t matter one little bit.” pg. 188
Much of this is beside the point. Even if it weren’t, it wouldn’t matter, because photographs are only one of several methods used to identify victims. Harwood’s fixation on this issue ignores how victim identification actually works in real-world mass-casualty investigations.
Professional crank James Fetzer and his band of loopy dipshits place an inordinate amount of faith in Twitter posts, citing them repeatedly throughout the despicable Nobody Died at Sandy Hook. In Chapter Five, “Vivian Lee” leans heavily on a handful of confusingly time-stamped tweets—artifacts of a well-documented Twitter bug I’ve already addressed at length—to support one of her “top ten reasons Sandy Hook was an elaborate hoax.” On page 67, under “4. There was foreknowledge of the event,” she writes:
In addition, tweets about the shooting began before it occurred, a tribute was apparently uploaded one month before the event, and web pages honoring the victims, including a Facebook page R.I.P. Victoria Soto, were established before they had “officially” died.
A great deal of emphasis is also placed on a single, utterly mundane tweet from Sandy Hook Elementary principal Dawn Hochsprung’s Twitter account. Posted on October 17, 2012, it shows students participating in the school’s annual evacuation drill. Despite looking nothing like the chaos of December 14—an observation that should shock precisely no one—this image is nevertheless presented as “proof” that the massacre was merely a drill:
Safety first at Sandy Hook… It's a beautiful day for our annual evacuation drill! pic.twitter.com/F1121xE7
This claim only works if the authors accept Hochsprung’s Twitter account as legitimate. And they clearly do—because tweets from the morning of December 14 could not possibly serve as “evidence” unless Fetzer and company believed Twitter reliably displays authentic, user-generated content.
That commitment has consequences.
If Dawn Hochsprung’s Twitter account is real—and it must be, for their argument to function—then everything on her timeline from September through December 2012 must also be real. And what those posts show is not a shuttered building or an abandoned set, but a busy, fully operational elementary school: classrooms full of students, teachers collaborating, assemblies, performances, professional development, fundraisers, book fairs, and seasonal events.
That reality alone collapses Fetzer’s central claim that Sandy Hook Elementary had been closed and unoccupied since 2008—a claim upon which the entire conspiracy depends.
Unsurprisingly, the book makes no mention of Hochsprung’s Twitter timeline beyond the evacuation drill photo. Instead of linking directly to her account, the authors cite their own blog posts about the image. For example, on page 96:
They claim the scenery in one drill photo doesn’t match the scenery in another. This is a manufactured problem. The evacuation photos were taken just outside Sandy Hook Elementary’s front entrance—where Shannon Hicks was standing when she took them—while the fire drill continued behind the Sandy Hook Volunteer Fire & Rescue building, where the students ultimately walked, lined up, and were photographed for Hochsprung’s tweet. The structure visible behind the children in Hochsprung’s photo is the same structure visible behind the firehouse on Google Maps—a fact that’s obvious once you bother to look:
Not everything involving the school happens in one tightly cropped patch of pavement.
The more important question is why the original source is never provided. Why not link directly to Hochsprung’s actual Twitter timeline?
Because they can’t. The moment readers see the full feed—weeks of mundane, verifiable posts showing classrooms full of students, staff events, assemblies, rehearsals, and daily school life—the “closed since 2008” narrative disintegrates instantly. Selective screenshotting is the only way the claim survives.
On October 9, 2012, Hochsprung tweeted a photo from a Pathways to Common Core conference. While the image itself isn’t inside the school, the event is independently corroborated by the November 2012 Newtown Public Schools Superintendent’s Newsletter, which includes the following statement from survivor Natalie Hammond:
“Nobody Died At Sandy Hook” Chapter Eleven By: James Fetzer and Kelley Watt
When I saw the title of this chapter—“Are Sandy Hook skeptics delusional with ‘twisted minds’?”—I thought, Perfect. Easiest chapter yet. I’ll just write “yes”—or “yes, of course,” if I’m feeling loquacious—publish it, and move on to Chapter Twelve.
Unfortunately, there are actual claims being made here. Most are the same recycled nonsense we’ve already slogged through in earlier chapters, but a couple of new wrinkles are tossed in for variety.
“Nobody Died At Sandy Hook” Chapter Ten By: “Dr. Eowyn” (aka Maria Hsia Chang) and James Fetzer
Chapter Ten is an interesting read — not because it suddenly delivers anything resembling compelling evidence (spoiler: it absolutely does not), but because its central claim was thoroughly debunked years ago by Metabunk, Snopes, USA Today, and plenty of others. To their credit — sort of — the authors even admit this right in the opening paragraph. And yet, for reasons known only to them, the chapter keeps going. What follows is James Fetzer and Maria Chang tripping over themselves in an attempt at a rebuttal that basically amounts to “nuh-uh.” Gripping stuff.
