Despite having been debunked, discredited, and publicly humiliated so many times that those of us without an advanced degree in mathematics have lost count, bloated carny Wolfgang Halbig is somehow still out there (as opposed to locked up in a loony bin somewhere), doing his thing, shamelessly exploiting the slaughter of twenty small children and seven adults in a sad and fruitless attempt to be finally recognized as someone important (oh, and of course raise over $100,000 in the process).

One of Wolf’s favorite methods of disseminating his barely-literate and unhinged gobbledygook is an e-mail list that he’s compiled using the (unsolicited) e-mail addresses of anyone who has ever contacted him. I know this because I inexplicably found myself included in the list after asking him – sometimes politely and other times not so much – for my $1,000. So I now have the extreme privilege of witnessing his slide into what I have to assume is dementia first-hand. And while Wolfgang spam is one of the last things I want to see upon opening my inbox, it does allow me to debunk his bullshit that much faster. Which – wouldn’t you know it – brings us to today.

Since Friday, an apparently unsupervised Halbig has managed to fire off an impressive eleven e-mails, four of which were sent on Monday alone. But while much of the material is completely unintelligible, I somehow managed to decipher the following two claims:

Claim #1:

This mystery hole was then upgraded from a “huge hole” to a “huge sinkhole like we have in Florida” in an e-mail sent out the very next day:

And yes, he really did write “WHY DO YOU THING?” Maybe once he’s finally done “researching” Sandy Hook, he can research how to proofread an e-mail for once.

Wolf’s photo of this alleged “sinkhole” – again, truly Florida-esque in its enormity – is a still from a dashcam video, recorded by one of the responding officers as they pass Sunnyview Terrace on their way to Sandy Hook School. This video – along with a handful of others – is freely available as part of the state’s final report, so it’s a bit odd that Halbig, who must be swimming in materials obtained via his multitude of FOIA requests at this point, had to go to YouTube for it.

So is this a sinkhole? No, of course not. What kind of sinkhole is runs parallel to and underneath of a road?  But if it isn’t a sinkhole, then what is it? Simple: it’s a small culvert, similar to the one seen here (which I found – unbelievably – by Googling “culvert”):

As for Halbig’s claim that the hole magically disappears “when the news shows up” – the implication seemingly being that the dashcam video must have been taken either long before or long after the footage captured by news crews  (though it’s never explained why this would be necessary) – is similarly bogus.  Seeing as how the culvert is visible in Google’s Street View of the area from 2008…

As well as Google Earth’s satellite imagery from 2012…

And in the infamous Channel 12 helicopter footage, taken the day of the shooting…

And then again in their Street View from 2014…



We can be absolutely certain that this “hole” – which again, is just a regular ol’ culvert – was there the entire time.

But while Halbig is technically correct when he says that there is “no sinkhole” visible during Gene Rosen’s interview with Fox News (but only because it’s a culvert, and not a sinkhole), the photo he uses to illustrate this point is – as one should expect from such a prolific liar – incredibly deceptive. The culvert is clearly visible behind Mr. Rosen throughout most of interview, but whoever took this screenshot for Wolfgang (as we know he is too technologically inept to do it himself) conveniently waited until his body was positioned directly in front of it, shielding it from the camera.

Compare Wolfgang’s still to the following, which I personally took from the same exact interview/video:

Notice that the culvert is visible, as plain as day, just off of Mr. Rosen’s right shoulder. Also take note of the time, which reads 2:32PM EST. This is important because it means that whoever captured the screenshot used in Wolf’s e-mail sat through six more minutes of this interview, until Gene stepped to his right and positioned himself in front of the culvert, before they hit “print screen”. And if you don’t believe that this was done intentionally, then I have a bridge to sell you.

Unfortunately for Halbig, no amount of dirty tricks can fully obscure the truth. Even in his deceitful screenshot, we can see yellow police tape surrounding the culvert so that no one accidentally drives into it.

Claim #2:

So Wolfgang’s desperately searching for someone smarter “then” him, which is, to be perfectly blunt, about as low as any bar gets. Assuming I can first understand what he’s actually asking here, I may be able to help the (self-professed) “old man”.

Ignoring the rather vague claim that he has been denied “public records” (and he’s likely referring to the Super Bowl Choir “permission slips” he’s inexplicably been chasing as of late), he appears to be completely befuddled by one of five posters hanging in the school’s west hallway, opposite the entrance to the cafetorium. Specifically, Halbig doesn’t seem to understand how the posters seen in this crime scene photo can “still be” on a wall for three years (and that is assuming they were hung the same year the artwork was created). Halbig incorrectly states that they’ve been there since “at least 2008” – which would mean that they had been hanging there for four years (still not an issue to any reasonable, intelligent adult) – but this is absolutely not the case. These posters are actually the end result of logo contest which, according to this June 5th, 2009 article from the Newtown Bee, took place in the spring of 2009 (which would of course make it impossible for them to be hung anywhere in 2008):

A logo contest was held for the topic and all the entries were on display for attendees to vote on at Reed Intermediate School on May 16. The contest asked participants to create a logo that would remind people to be “Nicer In Newtown.”

Out of 65 entries, there were five winners. According to that same article, those winners were:

Katharine Humber and Michael Meyer tied in the kindergarten through fourth grade level. Other winners were Alexandra Lotko (grades five through eight), Michaela Beaudry (grades nine through twelve), and Tiffany Lotko (adult).

Katharine Humber’s entry depicted people standing around Newtown’s flagpole and helping others. Michael Meyer’s entry showed notable buildings in Newtown and the flagpole. Alexandra Lotko’s entry depicted two hands making the shape of a heart and the words “People are Nicer In Newtown.” Michaela Beaudry’s entry showed a larger chicken nuzzling beaks with a baby chick and the words, “People are Nicer In Newtown, and Ms Lotko’s entry depicted a tree going through all seasons with the flagpole and the words, “People are nicer in Newtown all season long.”

Do those five descriptions sound at all familiar to you? They should, as they describe the five posters shown hanging in the hallway; the ones Wolfgang Halbig refuses to believe could still remain three whole years later.

As for how these posters are still on the wall three years later, “adhesives” would be my first guess, though I am admittedly not entirely sure as I did not personally hang them. But if Wolfgang is ignorantly suggesting that the appearance of these posters must mean that the crime scene photos were taken in 2008 (and again, this is entirely impossible as they’re actually from 2009), he’d also have to ignore all of the items in the school – and included in these same crime scene photos – that did not come into existence until after 2008. Some of those items include a children’s book from 2012; a number of magazines from as recently as December, 2012; 2012 calendars; SMART Tables and projectors manufactured between 2008 and 2010; etc.

Furthermore, the entire premise is flat-out nonsensical. Why can’t a poster remain on a wall for three years? Halbig does not bother to explain. There’s also a “Charlotte’s Web” poster directly across the hall. Does that mean that these pictures were taken in 1952? Of course not.

72 Thoughts on “Fact-Checking More Of Wolfgang Halbig’s Absolute Nonsense

  1. Paula Taylor on February 5, 2017 at 2:45 am said:

    The only thing that has been debunked in Sandy HOAX–NO ONE BELIEVES YOU!!

    • Shill Murray on February 6, 2017 at 1:28 am said:

      Another impeccably researched, brilliant articulated refutation by the Sandy Hook denialist cult. Bravo, Paula!

      • A. Overstreet on February 27, 2017 at 5:59 am said:

        Sometimes I wonder if the Sandy Hook deniers are for real because, with little hyperbole, about 99% of the comments I read from them are rife with poor grammar, atrocious spelling, and seem to indicate a near total lack of understanding of modern American English.

        I try not to stereotype the sort of numbnuts that denies the murder of children, because I know more than a few, but they make it so hard. It is like they want us to think they are all from a cliched version of the rural south.

        No one believes you…aside from the 300 million or so Americans who aren’t complete idiots.

        • Orlando on October 31, 2017 at 1:05 pm said:

          I am a believer that Sandy Hook was a staged event. I like to look at all points of view, hence why I’m on this site. While Mr. Wolfgang may not have perfect arguments, grammer is probably the least important aspect of it all. This site seems to be very biased to peoples beliefs. If you look at all the actual facts, you may start to question it yourself. But don’t just brush them off as nonsense right away. Ask yourself why and why not.

          An example would be how those “families” are still making millions from donations by milking the whole situation. They’re still doing it up to today. Also, it’s funny how just about everyone’s home has been paid off in full the samee month. These are all facts that you can easily aquire legal proof of.

          • Shill Murray on December 22, 2017 at 8:47 pm said:

            This site seems to be very biased to peoples beliefs.

            If you believe in debunked nonsense, then yes, I have a problem with your beliefs. With that in mind, I would proudly say that I am biased towards facts.

            If you look at all the actual facts, you may start to question it yourself.

            Again, my only concern here is the truth, so all I deal with is “actual” facts. If you’ve found something here that isn’t factual, I’d love to hear about it.

            But don’t just brush them off as nonsense right away. Ask yourself why and why not.

            This is exactly what I’ve done here with this site and it’s the reason this site even exists in the first place. I was challenged elsewhere to look into the claims being made by James Fetzer specifically and decide for myself. So that’s what I did, and this site is the result. I don’t know why some people find it so hard to believe that those of us who believe the Sandy Hook conspiracy theories are total nonsense didn’t start off by asking the very same questions as people such as yourself.

            An example would be how those “families” are still making millions from donations by milking the whole situation. They’re still doing it up to today.

            What is your source on this? Where is your proof that the families of the victims are still – to this day – making “millions”? Furthermore, how is that proof of anything other than the generosity of others? Should everyone who has ever received support in the form of money due to a tough or tragic situation be viewed as suspect? Where do you personally draw that line?

            Also, it’s funny how just about everyone’s home has been paid off in full the samee month. These are all facts that you can easily aquire legal proof of.

            If it’s so easy to obtain “legal proof” of this claim, then let’s see it. Because I’m pretty positive that this one has been sufficiently debunked.

            It’s fine to ask questions, but you have to be prepared to look for answers, accept them, and then concede that maybe you were wrong.

          • Patrick Lange on December 27, 2017 at 1:45 pm said:

            Dude, you are in denial. The whole site is back up with facts, but you just don’t want to believe that it’s true because you love living in your little hoax fantasy world! That’s the problem here because you keep ignoring the facts that doesn’t support your pathetic hoax theory and want to be right. Obviously you are not right because all of your lame theories has been debunked countless of times! You just don’t want to accept that you’re wrong.

  2. Lincoln Kupchak on February 7, 2017 at 8:52 pm said:

    Did you respond to Wolfie’s email with these answers?

    • Shill Murray on February 7, 2017 at 9:04 pm said:

      I did. His lone supporter on this massive list replied and unsurprisingly called me a “troll”. Wolf then sent me (and me alone) a separate e-mail with the subject “PLease read Leonard Pozners lawsuit against me and see what you notice since you are so good at finding things”, which included no body, but attached copies of complaints he filed with the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ, as well as a copy of the motion for discovery in the Pozner case.

  3. Stephen on February 11, 2017 at 3:03 pm said:

    Wolfgang Halbig is a big dumb, deluded bag of crap. Only now is he learning the hornet’s nest he’s been throwing stones at, is fully of angry hornets.

    Now he wants to “settle” the lawsuit with Mr. Pozner…I think he just realized, “Discovery” works both ways….and is worried about what HE’S been hiding from his Hoaxer friend.

    Karma really IS A BITCH, Wolfturd. Enjoy what’s coming your way.

    • Vitriol notwithstanding, you failed to update your taunting post with the latest wrinkle in Pozner’s lawsuit.
      Pozner has employed a strategy of attacking those who question or challenge the government/media narrative of the staged event at Sandy Hook five years ago, and— until Halbig’s at-bat— has been thoroughly successful at getting others to back off.
      Lauded as a hero who is standing up to nameless/faceless ‘conspiratards,’ Pozner fell inexplicably silent in the face of Halbig’s acceptance of his challenge.
      Instead of shrinking off into the shadows, Halbig gleefully accepted the lawsuit filed by Pozner for in 2015 for posting his address, email and phone number online.
      And, hero that he is, Pozner avoided service and deposition for over two years prior to dropping the suit altogether just last month.
      Although he isn’t around for comment as to his intentions for dropping the suit after avoiding service and deposition for 32 months, perhaps he was concerned to have anyone determining his real name, since he has used more than a handful of aliases throughout.
      But really, who knows?
      He dropped his own lawsuit to avoid being deposed.

      A real, American hero.

      • Shill Murray on February 20, 2018 at 8:57 pm said:

        Vitriol notwithstanding, you failed to update your taunting post with the latest wrinkle in Pozner’s lawsuit.

        Why on Earth would I update a post about Wolfgang’s lies with information regarding an unrelated legal case… one that I’ve never reported on? What sense does that make?

        Pozner has employed a strategy of attacking those who question or challenge the government/media narrative of the staged event at Sandy Hook five years ago, and— until Halbig’s at-bat— has been thoroughly successful at getting others to back off.

        Pozner sued to have his personal information removed from Wolfgang’s site and Wolfgang removed it. So it sounds like he continues to be successful on that front, regardless of the civil case’s outcome.

        Instead of shrinking off into the shadows, Halbig gleefully accepted the lawsuit filed by Pozner for in 2015 for posting his address, email and phone number online.

        By “gleefully accepted”, do you actually mean “attempted to have the case dismissed numerous times and then refused to comply with discovery”? Because that’s all clearly outlined in the course docket, available here. They show that Halbig took almost a year to file his responses to Pozner’s initial set of interrogatories, and when he did, he objected to every last one of them. When asked point blank if Sandy Hook was a hoax by a later set of interrogatories, Halbig said he “doesn’t know”. Halbig is an obvious fraud and dunces like you are keeping his pockets nice and fat (though only metaphorically: those Dockers are already struggling).

  4. A. Overstreet on February 22, 2017 at 6:17 am said:

    Shill Murray,

    Excellent work. Halbig and his ilk should be ashamed of themselves for causing these people another moment’s pain.

    Keep it up. You’ll never convince the conspiracy kooks or the gun nuts looking for an excuse (proud firearms owner here BTW), but any light you can shine on these people will show them to the world as the fools they are.

    Again, good work, sir!

    • Shill Murray on February 22, 2017 at 2:39 pm said:

      Thank you so much! You’re absolutely right: the chance that I will convert any die-hard conspiracy theorist is incredibly slim, but by exposing these slimeballs for the unabashed liars and con-men that they clearly are, I can continue to reach those that may be on the fence (as I’ve already done, based on e-mails I’ve received).

      • A. Overstreet on February 23, 2017 at 12:11 am said:

        Ms. Roig,, the teacher whose room the shooter (let his name die in obscurity) bypassed, due to a piece of paper she forgot to take down that covered the window of her classroom, is speaking in Rockaway, NJ next month about active shooter response.

        I am taking it upon myself to attend in case any of these hoaxers show up and try to intimidate this wondeful human being or try to turn the meeting into a circus. I encourage anyone from New Jersey who has the time to do the same. Feel free to drop me a line about attending and we can meet up.

        Anyone with a child in a school, even if you aren’t interested in confronting hoaxers, should attend. My father and I had to spend our own money, time, and labor installing manual dead bolts on every door in the school my two sons attend to ensure nothing like Sandy Hook could happen so easily there. Please check your children’s school to see if they have lockdown procedures in place. If not, start asking why?

        http://morristowngreen.com/2017/02/14/facing-the-unthinkable-newtown-shooting-survivor-to-address-morris-forum/

        G-d forbid something should happen and you come to find out you are a crisis actor and that your child never existed…

        Keep up the good work, sir.

  5. A. Overstreet on February 23, 2017 at 2:39 am said:

    As an aside, a victim of the Holocaust won a lawsuit against a famous denier, in a US court, when the denier offered $50,000 to anyone who could provide proof the Holocaust actually happened. Needless to say, the victim was able to provide the court with ample evidence of what befell the Jewish people in general, and he in particular.

    I know the sum is too low for any lawyer to bother, unless the offending party was made to cover costs, but it would be funny to see someone sue Mr. Halbig for that $1,000.

  6. A. Overstreet on February 23, 2017 at 2:50 am said:

    Last message, I promise. Sorry for cluttering up your site. Feel free to condense or eliminate these messages as you see fit. I won’t scream “Censorship!”

    https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2012/09/21/5-million-dollars-was-awarded-to-a-holocaust-survivor-in-a-holocaust-denial-lawsuit-in-1986/

    The lawsuit awarded $5 million dollars to the Holocaust survivor over the filaure to deliver $50,000 upon receipt of information proving Jewish people were gassed during the Holocaust.

    Maybe some lawyer would take up a $1,000 case against Halbig. 1/50 of $5 million is $100,000. Not exactly chump change.

    • Shill Murray on February 23, 2017 at 4:25 pm said:

      Haha. No worries! I don’t mind the comments at all. I’ve heard of similar cases that have taken place overseas (such as the measles “skeptic” that was forced to hand over 100k Euros by a German court, although I believe the case may still be on-going), but didn’t realize that there were any examples from the United States. Still, I doubt I’d have much luck actually collecting. After Halbig attempted to shut down SandyHookFacts.com (as it was interfering with his fundraising by telling the truth), the owner of that site – CW Wade – was awarded thousands in damages by the court. That was years ago, I believe, and Halbig has yet to pay up. Surprise, surprise.

      • A. Overstreet on February 25, 2017 at 8:16 pm said:

        Sir,

        Would you mind if I sent those pictures to Mr. Halbig, demanding payment? One of my many attorney friends (my mother reminds me constantly of how many of my friends went on to be lawyers instead of Marines) advised me that I can do this, then file a small claim against Mr. Halbig, and then, if payment is not sent, file suit against him.

        BTW- My friend was horrified to learn there was such a thing as a Sandy Hook Hoax movement, hence his desire to be involved.

        If I get the thousand, I’ll split it with you!

        Best Wishes.

        • Shill Murray on February 26, 2017 at 3:48 am said:

          Go for it! Best of luck. You’re going to need it.

          • A. Overstreet on February 27, 2017 at 7:59 pm said:

            Sir,

            Before I send Mr. Halbig a registered letter on this topic I would like to submit, to you, the evidence as I present it.

            Much of it will be heavily paraphrased versions of your work on the topic and I think it only fair that you review what I have written, remove anything you do not agree with, and correct anything I come up short om, factually speaking, as you are clearly much more of an expert on this topic than I am. Furthermore, I think it only fair that you are appropriately credited for your work as it may, hopefully, set a small precedent.

            If you could drop me a line to my email I would appreciate it. You can use a throwaway account, of course, as you don’t know me and the internet is filled with idiots (as the entire need for your wonderful website proves).

            Best Wishes.

  7. A. Overstreet on February 27, 2017 at 3:06 am said:

    Sir,

    Thank you. He seems like just the type of “person” who needs a little extra grief in his life.

    Best Wishes

  8. Mark E Mark on April 13, 2017 at 8:04 am said:

    Please don’t compare Sandy Hook to the Holocaust, there is ample evidence the Holocaust existed. Also aren’t the parents and people involved in “Sandy Hook Shooting” exploiting the deaths of their minors to gain money to campaign??? Because if my calculations are correct, the victims were rewarded millions from the estate of Adam Lanza’s mother…….. doesn’t make sense.
    Aurora Shooting victims didn’t get shit and there were videos/ample evidence as well as a high number of victims. Just saying.
    Call me insensitive for feeling this way, but I have no personal connection with any of these kids so the fact that people are so distraught over strangers is interesting. We are told to believe it….. or else! How bout I think for myself sorry it offends you. Should be way more broken up about the loss, not sure why they still stay in the limelight but to try to convince of that everything was real.

    • Shill Murray on April 14, 2017 at 6:16 pm said:

      Please don’t compare Sandy Hook to the Holocaust, there is ample evidence the Holocaust existed.

      There is a mountain of evidence that Sandy Hook happened. Familiarize yourself with the remainder of this site, order yourself a copy of the death certificates, read through the final report, etc. Unless you are mentally ill or in some other way on a permanent vacation from reality, this should suffice. Or maybe you’re the kind of intellectually dishonest prick who dismisses hundreds upon hundreds of official government documents as fakes without offering up so much as a shred of proof.

      Also aren’t the parents and people involved in “Sandy Hook Shooting” exploiting the deaths of their minors to gain money to campaign??? Because if my calculations are correct, the victims were rewarded millions from the estate of Adam Lanza’s mother…….. doesn’t make sense.

      The families of sixteen of the victims received $93,750 each from Nancy’s $1.5 million estate. So no, your calculations are not correct. And to be honest, the fact that you’re not all that good at math doesn’t come as much of a shock to me. But your logic is comparably abysmal, so at least it has some company.

      Aurora Shooting victims didn’t get shit and there were videos/ample evidence as well as a high number of victims. Just saying.

      To be clear, there is a video of James Holmes entering the lobby of the theater, but there is no video of him shooting anyone (and surely you understand that a commercial building is far more likely to be equipped with security cameras than a small elementary school). So, if I were to play devil’s advocate, I’d ask you how you know the shooting actually happened. Plenty of people don’t believe that it did, and they could point to a lack of video showing the actual shooting as proof of that. The goalposts can always be moved. As for the claim that they didn’t “get shit”, I’m not sure if you’re being ignorant or deceptive (or both!) here. The victims absolutely, positively (and many would argue rightfully) sued Cinemark in state and federal court. The problem is that the cases were decided in favor of Cinemark, and because this is Colorado (and not Connecticut), Cinemark was allowed to recover legal fees, and they asked the victims for ~$700k. They eventually dropped those claims against all but four victims. Your claim also ignores the fact that those same victims received over $5 million in donations from the Aurora Victim Relief Fund. There’s also the money raised by the National Compassion Fund/Aurora. And Holocaust survivors have received hundreds of millions in reparations from Germany, France, etc. In fact, I would challenge you to find just one high-profile tragedy in which the victims or their families did not at least attempt to recover funds. Just one.

      Call me insensitive for feeling this way, but I have no personal connection with any of these kids so the fact that people are so distraught over strangers is interesting.

      Explaining empathy to some anonymous dipshit is beyond the scope of this website, but you may just be a sociopath. Or, at best, an asshole.

      Should be way more broken up about the loss, not sure why they still stay in the limelight but to try to convince of that everything was real.

      The overwhelming majority understands that this shooting happened and do not need to be convinced. These parents – save for maybe Lenny Pozner – are not concerned with what the dark and disturbed recesses of the Internet – an almost minuscule minority – believe. At least not until these nitwits begin harassing them at home and at work, as they are prone to do from time to time. Furthermore, using your own example in the Holocaust, there are plenty of people still out there “in the limelight” combating Holocaust denial each and every day. So if raising awareness is at all suspicious to you, you’ve already given yourself plenty of ammunition to begin questioning the Holocaust as well. I’m sure James Fetzer will appreciate the company.

  9. Wayne williams on June 18, 2017 at 6:35 am said:

    The conversation has raised more doubts about the official story then discredited Halbig. 300 million people usually declare a person a nut then leave it at that but the host spends so much energy reinforcing the message of halbig=nut, halbig=nut, halbig=nut it becomes obvious that regardless of halbig’s attempts to bring attention to official fact lack of consistency, some of it is a stretch, but the host does more to give Halbig more deserving of a voice to question the official story then this declares. Hint to host…this blog dedicated to Halbig only make his nut claim more legit. The little bird running around stating the sky is falling, the sky is falling doesn’t need a blog to state the bird is crazy. Thanks host for bringing attention to Halbig’s story, any attention good or bad helps.

  10. George on August 22, 2017 at 6:52 pm said:

    Shill,

    Love your work and your delivery as well. I often struggle to understand if Fetzer, Halbig, et al are intentionally deceitful, or just plain stupid. I guess another alternative is mental illness (no one can be that stupid…can they?) Having had an email exchange with Fetzer, I’m leaning towards mental illness. Your thoughts?

    • Shill Murray on August 23, 2017 at 2:30 am said:

      Thanks, George. I appreciate that.

      I’ve spent some time wondering the very same thing, and my best guess is that they’re all likely some combination of all three (stupid, intentionally deceitful, and mentally ill), albeit to varying degrees. For instance, while all of them are certainly stupid, Halbig is much moreso than his peers. Seriously, the guy is barely literate. Fetzer – who I’ve also exchanged e-mails with – is also an idiot, and I have no doubt that he believes his own nonsense, but he is probably more of a conman than anything else.

      • George on August 23, 2017 at 2:32 pm said:

        You nailed it re: Halbig. Yet they carry on. They are like televangelists in that will always have a following of really stupid people, aka true believers ,who will defend them no matter what they do or say. Fascinating, and also scary.
        But here is the kicker: Fetzer went to Princeton, and he taught for 35 years. (I assume this is true, but on second thought, given his obvious cons, maybe this isn’t even true). As I prepare to send my son to an elite university, I think I’ll sleep better at night knowing (or assuming) that his cv is all made up as well.

      • Bob Terry on October 11, 2017 at 1:40 pm said:

        They continue to pop up after almost every tragedy. Within hours of the Las Vegas massacre the nutjobs were calling it a false flag attack. I
        engaged several in a minor tweet storm but soon gave up. Thank you for your hard work. I can only imagine how frustrating things must be considering the current conspiracy climate in Washington DC.

    • Anonymous on September 27, 2017 at 10:28 am said:

      < often struggle to understand if Fetzer, Halbig, et al are intentionally deceitful, or just plain stupid.

      Intentionally deceitful.

      Jim Fetzer and Wolfgang Halberg are both U.S. military intelligence operatives engaging in domestic psychological operations against the American public, under the direction of either the U.S. Dept. of Defense or the Central Intelligence Agency (most CIA operatives are ex-military). Jim Fetzer was in the U.S. Marines and Wolfgang Halbig was in the U.S. Air Force.

      • Shill Murray on October 14, 2017 at 5:23 pm said:

        I can see why this would be a convenient line of thought for conspiracy theorists. Surely they’re an embarrassment to many, so it’s easier to believe that they’ve been planted here in order to make you all look stupid, or throw the skeptical off the trail, etc. But the truth is that they’re just silly old opportunists, Fetzer moreso than Halbig as he’s been doing it for decades.

  11. Hello Shill,

    I have been looking at both sides of the issue and I wish you would cover some more telling evidence of this possibly being something other than what the media has led us to believe. You spent that much time and energy on a sink hole and a picture on the wall, at this point what you just “exposed” is a joke. No disrespect just honesty…..

    • Shill Murray on October 14, 2017 at 1:51 am said:

      Kyle,

      There’s a whole website here with sixty-eight entries in total. Which “telling evidence” are you looking for me to debunk? Because it’s probably already here somewhere. If you don’t see it, let me know.

      You spent that much time and energy on a sink hole and a picture on the wall, at this point what you just “exposed” is a joke.

      No offense, but I’m not entirely sure you understand what this entry is even about. Denier hero Wolfgang Halbig made some very specific claims in one of his many infamous e-mail blasts, and what I’ve done here is debunk those claims and only those claims. This single entry was never intended to be a complete deconstruction of the entire hoax narrative; just a fact-based rebuke of one of Wolfgang’s e-mails. The only joke here is that anyone takes Halbig seriously after these repeated blunders.

      Again, if you’re looking for a particular claim, please utilize the site’s search feature.

    • “Both sides” of the issue?
      A mentally ill person killed his mother, went to a school, killed 26 people and himself.
      What other side is there?

  12. WOW you deleted my comment…. that speaks volume, you are a complete JOKE!
    You have Shill in your name for a reason. This douche made an entire article highlighting grammar, a sinkhole and a kids drawing on the wall give me a break. FUCK YOU AND ALL YOUR ARROGANT/IGNORANT FOLLOWERS.

    • Shill Murray on October 14, 2017 at 2:03 am said:

      Don’t get your pull-ups in a bunch, champ: no one deleted your comment. It – along with a number of other comments – went into moderation, where it was waiting for my approval. And I haven’t moderated the comments here in months, as I’ve been extremely busy. Unlike actual, admitted shills – such as Fetzer and Halbig – I don’t get paid to talk about Sandy Hook, so sometimes gems such as this one have to wait before they’re pushed through.

      You have Shill in your name for a reason.

      You do know that I chose that name for myself, right? It wasn’t bestowed upon me by anyone. I alone chose it. That’s why it’s there. Do you not understand satire? Or how the Internet works?

      This douche made an entire article highlighting grammar, a sinkhole and a kids drawing on the wall give me a break.

      As explained, I made an entire article debunking an e-mail’s worth of claims made by denier mouthpiece Wolfgang Halbig. If you have a problem with the gravity of the claims, take it up with him.

      FUCK YOU AND ALL YOUR ARROGANT/IGNORANT FOLLOWERS.

      Didn’t you just end your previous comment with ” No disrespect just honesty…..”? And didn’t you claim you were “looking at both sides of the issue”? Funny how quickly this veil of neutrality disappears the second you feel slighted by a website’s comment approval process.

    • Patrick Lange on December 28, 2017 at 12:37 am said:

      If this site is a complete joke, prove it then! ! Prove that his debunks are wrong. So far you guys are not doing that! Swearing and childish name-calling doesn’t prove him wrong. It just shows that you guys lost the whole argument.

      It just seems that you guys are just in deep denial and can’t accept the harsh reality that little innocent children were murdered.

  13. Joolzeboy on October 3, 2017 at 1:49 pm said:

    Robbie Parker? Shill?

  14. I’m not surprised to say the least to see the way you all act to Wolfgang for questioning an already strange event. Nearly every comment (and the article itself literally only utilized the author’s egotistical attitude, and nothing else) is saying nothing more than mean things to this man. I find it ironic that the because a citizen decided to question something, he is immediately called “mentally ill” for not blindly following everything he hears from TV. May I be the first to admit that I could not live with myself if I continued to collect thousands of dollars (even years later) after my child was murdered in school?

    • Shill Murray on December 22, 2017 at 8:26 pm said:

      Nearly every comment (and the article itself literally only utilized the author’s egotistical attitude, and nothing else) is saying nothing more than mean things to this man.

      You can believe whatever farcical, goofball conspiracy theory you wish to indulge in, but this is patently false, by any metric. The title of this specific entry is “Fact-Checking More Of Wolfgang Halbig’s Absolute Nonsense”, and that is exactly what I’ve done here. Halbig uses one photo – a poor-quality still from a YouTube video – to make some absurd claim about a “disappearing sinkhole”, and I use eight – taken at different times, from different angles, and collected from different sources – to prove that it is absolutely, positively not true. That is objectively the definition of fact-checking. To say that I’ve done nothing but insult him here is entirely disingenuous.

      I find it ironic that the because a citizen decided to question something, he is immediately called “mentally ill” for not blindly following everything he hears from TV.

      I’ve never once suggested that anyone is mentally ill simply for questioning “something”. Again, that is simply not true.

      May I be the first to admit that I could not live with myself if I continued to collect thousands of dollars (even years later) after my child was murdered in school?

      May I be the first to admit nobody really cares how you would personally react to your child being murdered? Are you suggesting anyone that has ever received a donation due to a family tragedy is faking it?

  15. It’s be more interesting if you’d debunk the harder stuff instead. Like, why did the dispatch not report shots fired, making it a much lower priority call? Why were no paramedics allowed inside the school, let alone the children weren’t pronounced dead until the police made that decision 19 minutes after Lanza was found, if I’m not mistaken that still has to be verified by a medical professional. Not a single person was wounded, not a single person was even considered to be transported to trauma center. Why did we see things like the entire crowd walking circles around the fire station? Why did the police report leaving children alone in the rooms where the shooting took place. Why were half the children that supposedly died singing at the super bowl? Why were all the parents actors and all moved away before conspiracy nuts started up? Why was one of the deceased children photographed on Obama’s lap after the fact? Sure there was no hole and it was just a culvert, but there WAS mildew and severely neglected grounds. If you look today that’s all been cleaned up, because now it’s actually an operating school. All budget information shows no attempt to get this school to code in the years preceding the event. But I bet they have a new roof now.
    Oh and those pictures on the wall were supposed to be at Reed Intermediate School. One of them was made by a middle school student, the other a high school student, another by an adult, and finally two were made by elementary school students in the Newtown school district. There really is no good reason why those would ever be at Sandy Hook Elementary. They made the wall look less water damaged I suppose.

    • Shill Murray on January 1, 2018 at 9:59 pm said:

      It’s be more interesting if you’d debunk the harder stuff instead.

      I only debunk what I see, and I see plenty of horseshit coming from Wolfgang Halbig. Or at least I used to, until he (finally) took me off of his unsolicited mailing list.

      Like, why did the dispatch not report shots fired, making it a much lower priority call?

      Citation, please. Listening to the calls included with the final report, I hear a number of references to shots being fired. 14‐36‐32 appears to be the first ETS call listed in the accompanying audio log, and the dispatcher says, and this is an exact quote, “Chris, I’m on the line with a 911 call with Newtown. They had a shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School.” So I’d like to know which dispatch you’re referring to.

      Why were no paramedics allowed inside the school,

      Again: citation, please. A number of paramedics went inside of the school, and that is corroborated by the final report. Do Cassevechia, Reed, etc, not count as paramedics?

      let alone the children weren’t pronounced dead until the police made that decision 19 minutes after Lanza was found,

      Citation, please.

      if I’m not mistaken that still has to be verified by a medical professional.

      The victims were black tagged, following the SMART Triage protocol, by medical professionals. Again, this is all over the final report. Beyond that, I’m honestly not sure what you’re talking about. Please elaborate if you believe my answer to be insufficient.

      Not a single person was wounded, not a single person was even considered to be transported to trauma center.

      This is 1000% incorrect. I don’t mind having an honest discussion with deniers here, but I’m not going to bother repeating myself over and over if you aren’t going to at least make an effort to come equipped with the facts. I’m not trying to be cruel or dismissive here, but this is just nonsense and it makes you look like either a liar or an ignoramus. I thought it was common knowledge that Natalie Hammond and Deborah Pisani with both injured, the latter of which can even be seen in the Triage area by the firehouse in the Channel 12 footage. There’s also the matter of one children which – contrary to your claim – was rushed to the hospital, where they later died. The rest are known to have injuries “not compatible with life”, though medical personnel checked on them several times with a cardiac machine. Again, this is all in the final report.

      Why did we see things like the entire crowd walking circles around the fire station?

      We didn’t. You fell for an obviously (and poorly) edited video. Sorry.

      Why did the police report leaving children alone in the rooms where the shooting took place.

      Citation, please.

      Why were half the children that supposedly died singing at the super bowl?

      They weren’t. This is a very stupid thing to believe. The children that sang at the Super Bowl were fourth graders; three years older than the victims. They were also different children. Contrary to your claim that I haven’t written about any “harder stuff”, I’ve already written multiple articles about this bit of nonsense. I even reached out to an anthropometrist/biometricist – she literally wrote the book on photographic facial comparisons – and asked her about it. Naturally, she thought the idea was ridiculous and confirmed that the choir member usually singled out by deniers when repeating this pablum was not one of the victims. This should be obvious to most normal people.

      Why were all the parents actors and all moved away before conspiracy nuts started up?

      All of the parents were actors and moved out of Sandy Hook? I hate to sound like a broken record, but citation needed. I would certainly love to see proof that all of the parents were actors. This is your claim, so you should be able to easily back it up.

      Why was one of the deceased children photographed on Obama’s lap after the fact?

      She wasn’t; it was her sister. *Again,* you accused me of ignoring this alleged “hard stuff”, but I have absolutely written about this specific claim elsewhere on my site. In the future, I would suggest looking at all of the available material before telling me what I have and have not tackled.

      Sure there was no hole and it was just a culvert, but there WAS mildew and severely neglected grounds.

      According to who?

      If you look today that’s all been cleaned up, because now it’s actually an operating school.

      It’s been “cleaned up” because it’s *an all new school.* Do I really need to explain to you that a *brand new school* will look significantly better and cleaner than one that was 50+ years old? This is absurd.

      All budget information shows no attempt to get this school to code in the years preceding the event. But I bet they have a new roof now.

      Citation needed. Show me what was not “up to code”. In the 2011 School Facilities Survey, the roof – which was replaced in 2007 and scheduled to be replaced due to leaks – received a 4, or “not a problem”.

      Oh and those pictures on the wall were supposed to be at Reed Intermediate School.

      You’ve very clearly either misread or misunderstood. Only the entries – the 65 that were to be voted on – were on display at Reed; what’s seen hanging in Sandy Hook are the winners, and nowhere does it say that the winners were to be on display at Reed and Reed only. Nowhere. It’s clear that they made some small posters out of the winning entries and hung them around the district.

      There really is no good reason why those would ever be at Sandy Hook Elementary.

      According to who? You? Is this based on anything tangible? It was a district-wide logo contest; why wouldn’t they hang them there? Especially seeing as how two of the winners were from one of the district’s elementary schools, possibly Sandy Hook.

      They made the wall look less water damaged I suppose.

      So rather than simply repaint the walls white, which any putz could quickly and easily do within a manner of minutes, you personally believe that they instead dug up five pristine posters from a three year-old logo contest (in which there were five winners) and placed them in such a way that hid water damage that just so happened to manifest itself in such a convenient pattern? Come on.

      Furthermore, I’d estimate these posters have been hung maybe five feet off of the ground. What kind of “water damage” do you believe existed five feet from the ground? I’m genuinely curious.

      • Chris on April 26, 2018 at 4:29 pm said:

        It’s kind of mind blowing that the kinds of questions Mac and others here have thrown at you are still in circulation, still being treated like fresh new A-ha moments, over five years after the fact. Free houses, man!

      • MikeJ on April 27, 2018 at 1:09 pm said:

        Why do these people keep bringing up the same old debunked nonsense? Are they even looking at this site? All of the stuff Mac brought up has already been explained and debunked years ago! They need to play catch up.

  16. There would be no conspiracy theorist on Sandy Hook if simple questions or procedural reports or documents were granted to US Citizens. Trivial questions like Maintenace work order copies of repairs on the school. Why weren’t trauma helicopters weren’t called. Why was Connecticut law not followed when declaring someone deceased. Why were paramedics allowed to try and save the little Chicken? These reasonable inquiries were met with a harassment, threats and a tyrannical attitude.

    • Shill Murray on January 3, 2018 at 12:41 am said:

      There would be no conspiracy theorist on Sandy Hook if simple questions or procedural reports or documents were granted to US Citizens.

      An unprecedented number of official documents have already been made public; likely moreso than any other major crime in American history. Yet Sandy Hook deniers still exist. So I find the claim that “maintenance work orders” – which have never been public record, as far as I know – would make you all disappear for good honestly a bit laughable. Besides, these goal posts vary greatly, depending on the depravity of the denier. Sometimes they claim it’s “maintenance work orders” that they’re after. Sometimes it’s yearbook photos. Often times it’s autopsy photos. And let’s be real, if deniers claim that what has already been included in the final report is all “fake” – and of course everything that discredits their narrative is “fake” – what’s to stop them from saying the very same thing about maintenance reports? Come on.

      Why weren’t trauma helicopters weren’t called.

      Probably because the few victims that did not show signs incompatible with life (and were subsequently black tagged on the spot) were driven to nearby Danbury Hospital, which is only 11.4 miles from the school. In what universe does it make more sense to dispatch a helicopter to the school and then fly those victims to a hospital that is only 11.4 miles away? It’s ludicrous.

      Why was Connecticut law not followed when declaring someone deceased.

      Citation, please. What is Connecticut law, in this situation? Show your work. Provide sources.

      Why were paramedics allowed to try and save the little Chicken?

      What?

      These reasonable inquiries were met with a harassment, threats and a tyrannical attitude.

      I have never harassed or threatened anyone, unless you believe asking Wolfgang Halbig for the $1,000 he promised in exchange for photos of the 2012 Veterans Day Breakfast is harassment.

  17. The claims made by Wolfgang Halbig that you say you debunked stand stronger than any of the fatuous verbiage that you post on here. You devoted a whole website to smearing the unimpeachable reputation of a man who has served his country with particular distinction. You aren’t even able to use your real name, let alone come up with any convincing arguments. This is a man who has made an honorable career assessing the safety of schools throughout the country and what you proffer as “debunking” is regurgitated information from a lot of already discredited government sources.
    The best investigative journalism (which is my profession by the way) utilizes PRIMARY source material and asks much deeper questions. I know it’s pantomime season, but stop the charade

    • Shill Murray on January 8, 2018 at 1:33 am said:

      Strange that an alleged professional “investigative journalist” could fall for the tall tales of an admitted liar. If you can find the time (in between your investigative journalism work, which is definitely real), be sure ask him about driving Martin Luther King Jr. around Florida. I’m particularly curious to hear how he managed to do that during his brief stint as a State Trooper, seeing as how that was six years after MLK’s assassination. I’m sure you’ll get to the bottom of that one. Or maybe you can ask him how things are working out for him as a certified fire inspector. The state of Florida disputes that claim, but the guy’s got an “unimpeachable reputation”, so maybe they’re lying. It is Florida, after all!

      But let’s focus in on the claims seen here; the claims you say “stand stronger” than the seemingly irrefutable facts I’ve posted alongside them. I say “seemingly” because after all that binary diarrhea, you haven’t bothered to refute them. Seems like the obvious thing to do, right? Since they’re so fatuous? Surely it should be a walk in the park for a serious, professional investigative journalist (posting from an Kenyan IP address) such as yourself, right? So have at it!

  18. Vynz Brah on November 16, 2017 at 10:44 pm said:

    Lol this is some kike shit. How much are you getting paid for this trash?

    • Shill Murray on November 16, 2017 at 10:57 pm said:

      Amazing refutation of what’s been provided here. Bang-up job.

      How much are you getting paid to make deniers look like a bunch of braindead antisemites? How much is Wolfgang paying y’all to spam this specific entry? Of course I’ve never made a cent off of this website, and I’ve been offering a cash reward to anyone that can prove otherwise for years. Of course no one has ever even made an attempt on it. I’ve mentioned this a number of times, but you don’t really strike me as the reading type.

  19. BY the way,
    Lenny Pozner/ Lenny Osner/ Leonard Posner/Eliezer Pozner just dropped his lawsuit against Wolfgang Halbig after Halbig requested verifiable proof of identity. This man has INCONTROVERTIBLY gone by numerous aliases over the years. Halbig, however, intends to counter-sue and keep the issue alive via the court system so that these truths can come to light. Hope you report this on your website

    • Shill Murray on February 20, 2018 at 8:34 pm said:

      I don’t report on legal issues; I debunk goofball conspiracy theories.

      Lenny Pozner/ Lenny Osner/ Leonard Posner/Eliezer Pozner just dropped his lawsuit against Wolfgang Halbig after Halbig requested verifiable proof of identity.

      This is according to… whom? Wolfgang Halbig? Do you also believe him when he says he was Martin Luther King Jr.’s personal chauffeur? Or when he says he’s some sort of nationally recognized and respected school security expert? What has this lunatic done to earn anyone’s trust?

      This man has INCONTROVERTIBLY gone by numerous aliases over the years.

      Looks like he’s used a few different variations/spellings of the same name. So what? My family did the same thing when we came to this country. Oh, no! Maybe my family is full of crisis actors! Am I even real??

      Halbig, however, intends to counter-sue and keep the issue alive via the court system so that these truths can come to light.

      Laughable. Halbig’s big countersuit is his attempt to recover court costs. How brave! What a warrior for truth! He had his chance to make his case during discovery, which he avoided to the best of his ability (after multiple attempts to have the case dismissed). This is just like the time he promised to stand by Jonathan Reich or Lucy Richards and use their cases to prove, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that Sandy Hook was a hoax. And how’d that pan out? If Wolfgang was out to bring the truth to light, as you say, then why didn’t he do so in this case? He had his chance during discovery, but what did he do? I’ll let you see it for yourself:

      What a hero. If there was ever a chance to back up his claims, one would argue it was the time he was asked about them, point blank, in a court of law. And he chickened out.

  20. KHAZAR-HUNTER on November 25, 2017 at 8:15 pm said:

    LOOK AT ALL THE FUCKING JEW TROLLS TRYING TO PROVE SANDY HOOK HAPPENED. FUCKING JEW CUNTS.

    • Shill Murray on December 22, 2017 at 3:09 am said:

      Another fantastic representative of the denier cult. You blow your dad with that mouth?

      • Patrick Lange on December 27, 2017 at 2:10 pm said:

        LMAO I think these people are just mad that their pathetic hoax theory has been proven to be complete nonsense. The only thing they can do is resort to childish name-calling and swearing.

  21. Pingback: Sandy Hook: the hideous messages still being sent to families | reasonable hank

  22. April Prichard on March 1, 2018 at 2:39 pm said:

    For the sake of clarification, lets say the photos you use and claim as real in this post are actually real. Can you explain how a car could be parked the way it is in the Halbig photo in any of your photos? I cannot. I’ve examined them and your angles are all wrong. A car the size of that green car would not fit a safe distance between your “culvert” and the No Outlet sign. This No Outlet sign is missing from a couple of your photos, as well. I might also mention that the ad hominem attacks do nothing to add to your credibility….and isn’t is a bit hypocritical to condemn someone’s spelling and then refer to them as “Wolf” when that is not their name. That is a grammar error.

    • Shill Murray on March 5, 2018 at 7:59 pm said:

      For the sake of clarification, lets say the photos you use and claim as real in this post are actually real.

      They are real, and I’ve explained exactly how I’ve obtained these photos by using free, easy-to-use, publicly available tools. You’re certainly free to repeat the work that I’ve done here and confirm for yourself that they are legitimate.

      The first photo is from Google Maps, and all one would need to do is look up 20 Riverside Road in Newtown and change the snapshot date to 2008. That should be obvious from the photo. You can also just go here, if you’re feeling lazy:

      https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4225877,-73.2786704,3a,75y,41.31h,79.87t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1swQoZtas7Thhp4iamz1WFcw!2e0!7i3328!8i1664

      The second photo is from Google Earth, which you can either use in Chrome or download the app and run it from your PC/Mac. But I believe the historical satellite imagery, which I’ve used here, is only available via the app. So download it, look up 12 Dickenson Drive in CT, zoom in a bit, and use the slider in the upper-left corner to select 03/2012.

      The third photo is from the infamous Channel 12 helicopter footage. Look it up on YouTube. I’m not going to re-watch the footage (for the hundredth time) in order to give you an exact timestamp, but it’s there; you’ll just have to watch the video and find it for yourself.

      The fourth and fifth photos are – once again – from Google Street View. You can search for the addresses shown (17 Riverside Road and 2 Sunnyview Terrace, respectively), find an area that allows you to go back to October 2014, and then spin around a bit until you’re able to duplicate my screenshot. Here is a direct link to the 10/2014 view of 2 Sunnyview Terrace:

      https://www.google.com/maps/@41.4228599,-73.2783681,3a,75y,60.9h,66.47t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sTUNHPUm2t9ISXrqJhUTr6A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

      The sixth photo is from Google Earth, though it is nearly identical to the photo above it (they are, after all, both provided by Google). Again, if you believe these photos to be fraudulent or manipulated in any way, then I would strongly encourage you to take some time, download the Google Earth app, and look for yourself. Put forth a little effort before you accuse me of fabricating evidence.

      Can you explain how a car could be parked the way it is in the Halbig photo in any of your photos? I cannot. I’ve examined them and your angles are all wrong. A car the size of that green car would not fit a safe distance between your “culvert” and the No Outlet sign.

      Wait – why is “culvert” in quotes? That’s exactly what it is. It’s a culvert. This is inarguable at this point.

      Anyway, if you folks are to be believed, every single photo that’s ever been used to debunk some absurd Sandy Hook claim allegedly reveals some sort of physical impossibility that proves they’re all “Photoshopped”. It’s something I see too often, yet it’s never backed up by any sort of evidence. A cynic might suggest that it’s nothing more than a cheap way of dismissing evidence without having to do any sort of actual work.

      Both Halbig (who I suppose you’re now also accusing of using doctored photos) and I are using stills from the exact same video, though mine is of much higher quality, as per usual. The video in question – an oft cited Fox News interview with Gene Rosen – is still available here:

      http://video.foxnews.com/v/2043823745001/?#sp=show-clips

      As seen in the still as well as in the source video, there is caution tape wrapped around the wooden post, the Sunnyview Terrace street sign, and the “No Outlet” sign. The green car is obviously parked outside of that tape, to the right (if you were standing on Riverside, looking down Sunnyview) of the culvert and the sign. The car is not between anything, so there is nothing impossible going on here. Or do you believe that Fox News expertly digitally inserted this car into their interview footage? If so, for what reason?

      This No Outlet sign is missing from a couple of your photos, as well.

      I’m not sure what you’re driving at here, but it doesn’t matter because no, it’s not. Which photo do you believe it’s missing from?

      I might also mention that the ad hominem attacks do nothing to add to your credibility….

      Much like impossible angles, conspiracy theorists are always on the hunt for logical fallacies, either real or perceived (though they’re often the latter). Again, one could make the argument that it’s just an easy, intellectually dishonest way of dismissing an argument outright, without having to make any sort of real attempt at actually refuting the claims.

      There are no ad hominems here. An ad hominem is, by definition, “directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining”. It’s not just latin for “insult”. So if I had said something like “there’s no disappearing sinkhole on Riverside Road because Wolgang is a fat idiot”, that’s an ad hominem; thoroughly dismantling his many falsehoods and then calling him a “bloated clown” for his continued dishonesty is not. There’s a difference. Ad hominems are not typically 8,000+ characters long.

      and isn’t is a bit hypocritical to condemn someone’s spelling and then refer to them as “Wolf” when that is not their name. That is a grammar error.

      Boy, I hope you warmed up before that stretch. Yikes.

      Look, even if you don’t personally believe that “Wolf” is a valid diminutive for “Wolfgang” – in spite of the fact that “Wolfgang” literally translates to “traveling wolf” – the idea that shortening the man’s name is in any way comparable to his flimsy grasp on the English language is absurd. The guy is barely literate, and as he routinely asks for assistance from folks smarter than himself in his e-mail blasts, I think even he is acutely aware of his own orthographic shortcomings.

      If you really wanted to nail me on grammar – which, if we’re splitting hairs, is not synonymous with spelling – I’m sure there are far more egregious examples to be found in the ~70 entries I’ve written for this site. Hell, “Wolf” isn’t even the most outrageous, flippant nickname I’ve used for the guy. In the past, I’ve also trotted out:

      Wolfie
      Wolfgang Failpig
      Wolfgang Halfbrain
      Wolfgang Imadumbass Blowhard
      White Castle Wolfenstein

      And so on and so forth. Puerile? Absolutely. Examples of grammatical errors? No, of course not.

  23. ANASTASIA on March 12, 2018 at 1:18 am said:

    “Despite having been debunked, discredited, and publicly humiliated so many times that those of us without an advanced degree in mathematics have lost count, bloated carny Wolfgang Halbig is somehow still out there”

    WISHFUL AND DELUSIONAL THINKING ON THE PART OF THE AUTHOR

  24. Jason B on May 11, 2018 at 5:09 pm said:

    I wish Trump would just open up the investigation that Wolfgang wanted and get this over with. The hoaxers do not believe any of the evidence we give them. I know investigation would be a huge waste of time anyways, but unfortunately I think that’s the only way to settle this. I know the investigation would back fire on them anyways because I know for a fact that the shooting happened. If it does, maybe all of this conspiracy nonsense would go away! I just want some closure on this. It has been 5 years. It’s going on way too long enough. I just want the victims finally rest in peace.

    • Shill Murray on May 18, 2018 at 2:44 pm said:

      Any sort of additional investigation at this point would be a tremendous waste of time, money, and effort. Furthermore, it would do nothing to satiate con-men like Halbig, because the result would be the same. Look, this dummy’s been asking the same nonsense questions for years, going to great pains to ignore the answers; he’s not interested in the truth because it’s already out there. Nothing will make him or his type go away, especially as long as he stands to profit off of it. And even if there were some sort of small miracle and they finally moved on from Sandy Hook, they’d be there to harass the victims of the next mass shooting.

  25. Nothing_33 on July 1, 2018 at 7:29 pm said:

    He has another video out. This time he’s claiming that he contacted Sysco and was able to get an invoice for Sandy Hook, but the delivery wasn’t in Newtown, but Chalk Hill. I don’t remember the date, but obviously it’s before 12/14/12. What’s astonishing is the fact that you can’t just call up Sysco and get other people’s account information like that. So why people just passively believe this is hilarious. Plus, something like that would be considered as huge evidence that SHE wasn’t open, and yet he’s just chillin out on youtube with it instead of actually doing anything with it. Showing up to Washington, or filing a suit or something. Clearly it’s fake. Guess he’s getting desperate. Usually he just makes ridiculous claims. Now he’s creating false documents.

    • Gina on July 1, 2018 at 11:14 pm said:

      What Wolfgang has been calling an invoice isn’t an invoice. It’s a screen shot of Compass’s customer record. The hoaxers don’t seem to understand that a invoice would detail the items delivered and billed. Wolfgang tweeted what appears to be an actual invoice showing a delivery to SH at Dickerson Drive in Sept 2012. The invoice is just in one tweet to Ryan Gaydos at Fox News 6 days ago. I’m guessing it was an accident.

Leave a Reply to Stephen Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post Navigation